Monday, August 11, 2014

New license and SAP unit sale knackers Software AG's numbers


It’s only going to get worse before it gets better. As we discussed, the move to open systems caused by legacy software companies auditing their customers to make their numbers, is slowing the legacy software industry down. This provides opportunity to those that add value and take away pain. Aivars Lode avantce

New license and SAP unit sale knackers Software AG's numbers
Q2 revenues down by double digits, profits halved, CEO surprised
By | Gavin Clarke 24th July 2014 09:45

Delayed IT projects and offloading the SAP business have dealt Software AG’s business a double blow for its latest quarter.
Germany’s other major software maker today reported a second-quarter revenue drop of 18 per cent to €196m ($263.9m) and net income halved to €14.2m ($19.1m).
Earnings per share was also almost halved to €0.18 ($0.24).
In line with the company's on-prem peers, sales of new software slumped: new licences for the Business Process Excellence (BPE) portfolio was down 24 per cent to €32.7m ($44m) and ETS database licences fell 47 per cent to €17.4m ($19m).
Maintenance of its software was up – again, just like Software AG’s rivals: BPE climbed seven per cent to €51.9m ($61.8m) and ETS rose 11 per cent to €38.3 ($51.5m).
Consulting took a hit, falling six per cent to €47.2m.
The company blamed delays to big ticket project sign-offs for the fall in customers' spending on new Software AG licenses.
Chief executive Karl-Heinz Streibich is reported here to have called the drop in BPE a "surprise."
As for consulting, Software AG's trailing off of money that would have normally come from the company’s SAP consulting unit.
Software AG in June sold the final, European-chunk of its global SAP practices to Scheer Group having flogged the North American and Eastern European units last year. Software AG’s plan is to focus on development, sale and support of its own software instead. 

Google Attempts to Map Human Body


Western players IBM, Oracle, and HP are being rejected by China following Snowden revelations that the CIA funded. These companies are at the start up with back doors. Aivars Lode avantce

Google Attempts to Map Human Body

Can Rice Sorters and Car-Assembly Lines Inspire Mining Firms?


Miners look to the food industry and others to drive efficiency. Aivars Lode avantce

Can Rice Sorters and Car-Assembly Lines Inspire Mining Firms?
Rio Tinto, BHP Billiton Are Among Those Looking to Other Industries for Cost-Cutting Ideas
By
Rhiannon Hoyle in Sydney And
Alex MacDonald in London

July 28, 2014 2:04 p.m. ET
<image001.jpg>
BHP Billiton and Mitsubishi joint venture BMA's Goonyella Riverside coking coal mine in Queensland, Australia. Rhiannon Hoyle/The Wall Street Journal
PERTH, Australia—Global mining companies have scoured deserts, mountains and jungles for resources to rev up their profits. More recently, the search has taken them to a different environment: the factory floor.
Car-production lines and machinery that sorts rice could help companies such as Rio Tinto PLC and BHP BillitonLtd. BLT.LN -0.29% wring greater profits from mining. Whereas miners spent a decade spending billions on acquisitions and new projects, they are now taking an opposite approach—conserving cash while waiting for commodity prices to recover.
The hills around Kennecott, Utah, are home to one of the world's biggest copper mines. Recently, Kennecott has also become the location of a machine the size of four London double-decker buses that Rio Tinto RIO.LN +0.10% hopes will cut down on the quantity of rocks that need to be crushed in search of copper.
<image002.jpg>
The equipment is supplied by food processor Tomra Systems AS A, using technology it developed to sift everything from rice grains to scallops.
"What the food guys did 30 years ago, I see [us applying] successfully into the mining business," said John McGagh, head of innovation at Rio Tinto, one of the world's top five copper miners by output. "Rice sorters can color-sort up to a million objects a second."
When commodity prices started falling in late 2011, global miners responded by shutting pits, selling assets and laying off staff. Rio Tinto last year announced or completed sales of mines worth US$3.5 billion, and is using the proceeds to repay debts.
With the obvious cutbacks already implemented, companies are looking further afield for technology and ideas—to the military, aerospace and automotive industries.
For Lucas Dow, president of the BMA coal alliance in Australia run by BHP Billiton BHP.AU +0.26% andMitsubishi Corp. 8058.TO +0.37% , this shift took him to a Toyota Motor Corp. 7203.TO +0.43% plant just outside Nagoya, Japan. Iron ore is vital to make steel, a key raw material for Toyota's cars. But Mr. Dow was there on other business: to find ways of making mines thousands of miles away more efficient.
"We're certainly looking outside of our own industry, and shamelessly stealing and implementing ideas where it is possible," said Mr. Dow, who is based in Brisbane, Australia.
He said he's taking on many ideas from Toyota, the company that rewrote the book on lean manufacturing with techniques like just-in-time inventory, designed to wring out efficiencies. He wants to run BMA's mines using simple, repeatable processes that can flow without hitting bottlenecks, like a car assembly line.
At Goonyella Riverside, BMA's largest mine, which produces steelmaking coal, an employee recently suggested setting up several Formula One-style pit stops around the more than 12-mile-long mine site to improve refueling of dump trucks, which haul some 300 tons of raw material at a time.
That change came after Mr. Dow, praising the open communication between workers and management at Toyota, asked staff to provide feedback at the end of every shift.
BMA has also held discussions with supplier KomatsuLtd. 6301.TO +1.38% , a major Japanese equipment company, about using data analytics to keep its machinery running longer.
BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto are using so-called big data to fine-tune maintenance schedules so that the engines in their US$5 million trucks can be replaced just in time, rather than as prescribed by the manufacturers.
BMA has been looking at technology that enables mine managers to monitor truck engines remotely for problems—an idea borrowed from jet-engine makers Rolls-Royce Holdings RR.LN +0.09% PLC and Boeing Co. BA -0.11%
At Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. FMG.AU +3.71% —which hopes to lift output from its Pilbara mines in northwest Australia by as much as 13% through improving productivity—managers say a modular building style traditionally used in the oil-and-gas sector saved time and money in the construction of the company's latest processing plant.
Suppliers are also having to be more creative. Joe Mastrangelo, chief executive of General Electric Co. GE -0.78% 's power conversion unit, said miners have typically placed orders for new equipment with little dialogue. "But what we have seen in the past 12 months are a lot more discussions with clients who ask: 'What can you do to make me more efficient?'" said Mr. Mastrangelo. "Our job is to look for these solutions in other industries as mining recovers from its current capital expenditure downturn," he said.
At its Kennecott, Utah, mine, Rio Tinto crushes rocks the size of cars into fine powder to determine what should be kept. The process is costly, requiring lots of energy and water. Much of the crushed rock is simply tossed away.
Rio Tinto says food-processing technology could be a big help. Tomra's equipment uses color sensors to sort rice into white and nonwhite grains, before pressurized air is fired at unwanted grains to get rid of them. Adapting the technology to sort rocks containing iron or copper from barren material could lower costs.
According to Tomra, the technology could reject between 15% to 50% of rock before it is fully processed. It could also lower the mining industry's energy consumption by 15% and reduce the amount of water used by up to 1,050 gallons per ton of ore.
"We wouldn't do it unless the numbers look big and they do," said Rio Tinto innovation chief Mr. McGagh. He declined to estimate the potential savings, or how much has been invested till now.
So far, though, Rio Tinto hasn't been able to use Tomra's rice-sorting technology on a large enough scale. A machine in the Pilbara region was only able to process up to 150 tons of ore an hour, well short of volumes above 1,000 tons needed to make it viable. The Anglo-Australian miner hopes new trials at Kennecott will lead to a breakthrough.

Activist Investor Pushes EMC to Break Up


 It's fun to be a public company with investors ripping on you. Aivars Lode avantce

Activist Investor Pushes EMC to Break Up

Elliott Management Says Spin-Off of VMware Would Boost Stock Price

By Dana Cimilluca and Shira Ovide
Elliott Management Corp. has taken a stake of more than $1 billion in EMC Corp.and plans to push the data-storage giant to break itself apart, according to people familiar with the matter.
The investment, which hasn't been previously disclosed, amounts to about 2% of the Hopkinton, Mass., company's $55 billion equity value, and would make the hedge fund its fifth-largest shareholder, according to the most recent data available from FactSet. It is one of the largest positions Elliott, a 37-year-old firm with $25 billion under management, has ever taken.

Elliott is expected to argue that the company's present structure has hampered the performance of EMC's stock.
Elliott will seek to convince EMC that the company's lagging stock would receive a substantial boost if it were to spin offVMware Inc., a pioneer in computer-server software, these people said. EMC owns a roughly 80% stake in VMware, which is publicly traded.
"We're always happy to meet with our shareholders," an EMC spokesman said. He declined to comment further.
With $23.2 billion in revenue last year, EMC is made up of three businesses strung together in what the company refers to as its "federation strategy." They are: EMC Information Infrastructure—its traditional center of gravity, which dominates the data-storage-systems business—as well as VMware and software-development company Pivotal, which are both faster-growing. VMware trades publicly and has a market value of $41 billion, or 75% of EMC's market capitalization.
Should EMC move to split off VMware, potential buyers of part or all of the company could emerge, according to people who could ultimately be involved in such deals. Industry players who could be interested in part or all of EMC include Oracle Corp., Cisco Systems Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co., analysts have said.
Oracle and H-P declined to comment on the possibility of their companies' interest in purchasing all or parts of EMC. A spokesman for Cisco didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
If Elliott is successful, a breakup or sale could cause ripples through the roughly $2 trillion annual market for hardware, software, and technology services sold to companies, given what a significant player EMC is in server and storage systems. Elliott's investment in EMC also spotlights how size is increasingly not a barrier for activist investors, who have lately set their sights on some of the world's largest companies.
EMC is facing a number of headwinds. An emerging technology for saving digital data, known as "flash" storage, is giving upstarts a chance to dislodge EMC, which for years has been the dominant seller of hardware companies use to save data troves. Some companies, rather than buying gear from EMC, are storing data outside their computing centers with "cloud" services from providers such as Amazon.com Inc.
In the first quarter, EMC's sales rose by less than 2% from the same period a year earlier, while its net income dropped by roughly 30%. The company is set to report second-quarter results Wednesday.
EMC shares, which more than a decade ago soared above $100, now change hands for less than $27. They have risen 163% in the past 10 years, compared with a more than 309% gain for the Dow Jones U.S. Computer Hardware Index, even as VMware's value has soared. The Nasdaq is up 135% over the past 10 years.
Some analysts have argued that EMC's stock price doesn't reflect the full value of its traditional storage business and a separation of VMware could address that.
Elliott is expected to argue that VMware and the storage business are held back by the present structure, in which in some cases they compete with each other.

Elliott in the past week called EMC to inform it of the investment, and fund officials plan to meet with EMC Chairman and Chief Executive 
Joe Tucci, the people said.EMC said in a recent filing that its federation strategy "allows each of the three businesses to individually build products … they need to succeed in their respective markets while sharing the same ultimate goal of helping customers manage information."
Elliott has owned EMC shares on-and-off for a decade. Its current investment comes as Mr. Tucci, who has been CEO since 2001, is expected to retire around February 2015. The 66-year-old Mr. Tucci has put off previous retirement dates, however.
Shareholder activists like Elliott have become an increasingly potent force in corporate America in recent years, often successfully pushing companies to spin off divisions or sell themselves in whole or part.
Technology companies used to be seen as too large and complex to find themselves in activists' crosshairs, but that is changing too.
ValueAct Capital recently secured a seat on Microsoft Corp.'s board, and Carl Icahnpushed eBay Inc. to spin off its PayPal unit, before making peace with the company when it agreed to appoint a director he favored.
Elliott has made a slew of technology investments over the years, in many cases successfully pushing the companies to make changes. It has for example taken stakes in BMC Software Inc., Juniper Networks Inc. and NetApp Inc., an EMC competitor.

Sunday, August 10, 2014

Computer Sciences Profit Falls, Warns of Uncertain Federal Spending


It's getting tougher for the legacy guys. Aivars Lode avantce

Computer Sciences Profit Falls, Warns of Uncertain Federal Spending

Company Gets About One-Third of Revenue from Government

By Maria Armental

Computer Sciences Corp. said Thursday that its profit fell in the fiscal first quarter and warned of continued uncertainty over federal spending.
The Falls Church, Va., company gets about a third of its revenue from the government.
Shares fell 2% to $60 in recent after-hours trading.
For the most-recent period, through July 4, the company reported a profit of $151 million, or 98 cents a share, down from $177 million, or $1.14 a share, a year earlier.
Revenue slipped to $2.24 billion.
Analysts had forecast a profit of 94 cents a share on revenue of $3.19 billion.
Operating margin narrowed to 9.4% from 10.2% a year earlier.
The company reported income from continuing operations of $159 million, down from $161 million a year earlier. On a per-share basis, it was unchanged at $1.03.
By segment, the company reported a 3% increase in global business-services revenue to $1.09 billion, as industry software and solutions' sales offset declines in the company's consulting business. Global infrastructure services slipped 1% to $1.13 billion, which the company attributed to price-downs, contract conclusions and restructured contracts. Revenue at its North American public sector fell 3% to $1.02 billion, which the company attributed to continued uncertainty on federal spending.
The company maintained its fiscal 2015 target range for adjusted per-share profit from continuing operations.
Separately, Computer Sciences said it was expanding its alliance with International Business Machines Corp. in a move intended to accelerate customers' transition to the cloud.

Microsoft's Profit Takes Hit on Nokia


Not surprising all the legacy providers are taking hits as corporations don't like the audits that are being handed out. Aivars Lode avantce

Microsoft's Profit Takes Hit on Nokia

Software Giant's Revenue Increases, Beating Estimates

An initial report card came in for Microsoft Corp.'s purchase of NokiaCorp.'s mobile phone business. As feared, the marks were poor.
Nokia's former handset operation, which Microsoft bought for more than $7 billion in April, drained nearly $700 million from operating profit in the quarter, the company said on Tuesday.
Cost-cutting to offset Nokia losses also represented the lion's share of 18,000 job cuts ordered last week by new Chief Executive Satya Nadella, the biggest workforce reduction in its history.
The Nokia purchase could look smart in the long run if Microsoft is able to sell more of its smartphones and use them to lure customers to its software, Internet services and mobile apps. Initially, at least, that appears more hope than reality.

The company has been changing how it sells software to companies to pitch more of its Web-friendly software such as Office 365, an online version of its ubiquitous workplace document-and-spreadsheet software.
Microsoft's other businesses are doing well, with total revenue up 18% in its fourth quarter. Sales of Windows, Office, database and other products to companies rose 10.5%, a faster clip than in prior quarters. Microsoft also generated more profit out of those sales than it had in earlier periods.
"We're feeling quite proud of the aggressive move we've made here," Amy Hood, Microsoft's chief financial officer, said in an interview.
Microsoft stock rose 1% in after-hours trading to $45.33 following the earnings report.
Mr. Nadella has touted his vision for Microsoft as a "mobile-first, cloud-first" company. So far, the company has had much more success on the second part of that mission statement.
Even with the Nokia purchase, Microsoft sells fewer than 5% of all new smartphones purchased world-wide. The company said Thursday that it sold about 5.8 million Nokia smartphones since it acquired Nokia's handset business in April. By comparison, rival AppleInc. sold 35.2 million iPhones in the three months ended June 28.
The cloud-related businesses are faring much better. Microsoft said Office 365 sales more than doubled in the quarter. Total cloud revenue, which includes its Azure computing service, is on pace to generate $4.4 billion in annual revenue.
Microsoft also is posting heady growth in older products like its database software, called SQL Server, and the Windows operating software for computer servers. Microsoft's revenue from server-software licenses rose 14% in the fourth quarter.

Mr. Nadella, on a conference call with analysts, sketched out how he expected to invest money in the "core" areas like the Windows operating system and its software to help businesses and consumers live and work more efficiently.
The company also highlighted strong sales of the software to small-and-medium-sized businesses. Those smaller companies aren't historically Microsoft's best customers.
He pledged to keep a lid on costs, in part by stopping work on duplicative projects. As an example, Mr. Nadella said Microsoft would merge three versions of its Windows software for smartphones, tablets and PCs into a single operating system. Mr. Nadella also said Microsoft will "run all businesses in an economically sound way."

Net income for its fiscal fourth quarter ended June 30 fell 7.1% to $4.6 billion, or 55 cents a share, from $5 billion, or 59 cents a share, a year earlier. Revenues rose to $23.4 billion from $19.9 billion.
Those words should please investors, many of whom have said Microsoft spends money too freely on too many things. Microsoft also said Nokia will continue to be a drain on profits, before job cuts and other cost-cutting efforts make Nokia break even by Microsoft year ending June 2016.

HP's Machine and IBM's $3bn R&D splash – aka how to survive Google


Tough roads ahead for IBM and HP. Aivars Lode avantce

HP's Machine and IBM's $3bn R&D splash – aka how to survive Google


Failure to crack next-gen semiconductors threatens to set back humanity
By | Jack Clark 23rd July 2014 11:02

IBM and HP are trying to invent their way out of severe problems that lurk in their future.
Both companies face slowing sales in some of their traditional high-margin areas, like enterprise servers and other on-premises hardware. And both are having a tough time converting existing business divisions over to selling the high-margin "as-a-service" style IT products that many companies are demanding.

Meanwhile, the rise of remote computing and storage from companies like Amazon and Google, and remotely maintained software from companies like Salesforce and Box and even Oracle, stand to reduce the need for the types of on-premises gear and lucrative service contracts they specialize in.
Both companies suffer from problems partly of their own making. IBM's previous chief Sam Palmisano pledged in 2010 that per-share earnings for the company would reach $20 by 2015. This has forced today's chief Virginia Rometty to fire people, sell businesses – like the server division to Lenovo – and contort the company to trim costs where possible.
HP, similarly, is grappling with problems from previous chiefs, whether that be Mark Hurd's cost-cutting to its R&D division and buy of EDS for $13.9bn (in 2012, HP wrote down the value of that purchase by $8bn), or Hurd's successor Leo Apotheker whose public dithering over HP's PC plans sapped the company's share price, and whose acquisition of Autonomy for $10.7bn in 2011 (which was subsequently written down by $8.8bn) drove shares even lower. This period of poor management has led to a spate of severe layoffs at the company, amid slowing growth of the overall PC market and greater competition from servers.
And unlike smaller rival Dell, neither company can easily take itself private to perform the necessary surgery to convert itself to a firm fit for a modern IT era.
To try to offset their declines, both IBM and HP have tried to build cloud businesses using open-source technologies like OpenStack and a multitude of data centers around the world. IBM also bought SoftLayer for about $2bn to bolster its cloud.
But cloud is unlikely to create significant growth to offset the declines in traditional businesses – Amazon Web Services is acknowledged to be the leader in cloud services and is projected to bring in revenue of between $4bn and $5bn this year for the company. That's good money, but nothing compared to the annual revenues of HP (2013: $112bn) and IBM (2013: $99bn).
What both IBM and HP need is a new set of products that are desirable, pricey, engender customer loyalty, and difficult to replicate by hungry Asian-based hardware competitors, and – ideally – things that have better profit margins than traditional commodity hardware.
So both companies have pressed their significant research organizations into developing some tech to give them some hardware with these characteristics – an ambitious, eye-brow raising strategy at a time when the rest of the industry is focusing on software.
The two schemes are HP's memristor-dependent R&D scheme, which was codenamed "The Machine" and announced at HP Discover in June, and IBM's unnamed $3bn-over-five-years scheme which was revealed in July.
Though subtly different in emphasis and implementation, both projects serve the same purpose and speak to the same problems bedeviling the companies.
The Machine will give HP a set of products and services built around a proprietary hardware platform made up of low-power storage based on memristors; custom processors packaged up in novel ways; speedy data transfer via the clever use of photonic comms tech and custom interconnects; and a new operating system designed to handle the properties of memristors.
If successful, The Machine will give HP a high-margin way to make money and take a lead on its competitors. However, it's based on some difficult technologies, like the memristor that was meant to come out in 2013but is now not forecast to be ready for sale till 2016. It also uses other long-running HP projects, like a plan to mush processors and storage together into a "nanostore". Like the memristor, this tech has been around for a while – an early paper on it was published in 2011 – and its eventual due date is unknown.
IBM's cash splash, by comparison, will fund the shrinking of chips beyond the 7nm process scale, and will also bankroll the design of chips that feature unusual architectures. These could include "neuromorphic" processors that try to implement brain-like arrangements of semiconductor logic to create chips that are good at pattern and object recognition. Like HP, IBM plans to use photonics to let it "connect processors and memory in a more integrated way."
If the schemes work, then HP and IBM will be able to survive and prosper. If they fail, then both companies will have to divest themselves of multiple business units, layoff many of their employees and, perhaps, cede much of their business to new IT firms like Amazon or Google.
Worse, neither Amazon or Google or even Microsoft appear to do much fundamental hardware and materials science research, so for IBM or HP to stumble would likely set the wider technology industry back by decades. Their plans may be mad, but they're the best hope they – and by extension we, the wider tech community – have for ongoing gains in performance of the basic components of our digital lives.